3.5
Background to the Management
Decision Making Profile
The Management Decision Making Profile (MDP)
focuses on the ways that directors, managers and
professionals approach problem analysis and decision-making,
and it is frequently used in its own right to assess
individuals' preferred modes of behaving in these key
executive activities.
The aim of the Management Decision Making Profile is
to help identify your primary and backup modes of
decision-making when in the role of director or manager. It
seeks to identify and give recognisable definition to your
motivation and behaviour. It should also show you how some
of your most important drives and behaviours combine and
interact to produce your characteristic approaches to making
decisions in your job. The profile provides data about the
extent to which individuals and management teams or work
groups are likely to:
1.
Collect
and analyse data
2.
Generate
options
3.
Explore
new ideas and approaches
4.
Clarify
and crystallise issues
5.
Set
priorities
6.
Show determination
and resolve in pursuing objectives
7.
Time the seizing
of opportunities and taking action
8.
Think ahead,
in terms of consequences and outcomes
9.
Plan for results
and review progress.
The behavioural manager constructs upon which the MDP is
based have their roots in established psychological theories
of cognition and emotion. The framework around which the
questionnaire is built is developed from classical
approaches to problem analysis and decision making-both
military and industrial. The form of the instrument is a
development of the results of research undertaken since 1979
by Michael Williams and partners throughout Europe, the US
and the UK into:
·
Leadership 'style'
·
Executive competencies
·
Managerial behaviour
As with all other hawks mere Management Assessment Profile
the MDP was launched after evaluative research and 'field
trials' with hundred directors, managers and functional
specialists. The research upon which the MDP draws is
taken from the responses of over 5.000 directors, managers
and professional specialists from twelve different
countries, over a period of twelve years.
Since that initial validation, it has been used with several
thousand respondents from the managerial and professional
norm group in:
·
The UK |
·
USA |
·
Ireland |
·
Canada |
·
Western Europe |
If used in conjunction with either Myers Briggs Type
Indicator and/or The Leadership Style Profile the
instrument can provide significantly more relevant data
about how people-individually and collectively:
·
Think |
·
Handle conflict |
·
Feel |
·
Perceive the world |
·
Solve problems |
·
Make decisions |
Interpreting the scores
Rarely, if ever, can behaviours be directly measured with
consistent reliability, accuracy and precision. What
psychometric instruments do is to infer measurement
of preferences, tendencies and competencies.
From this information it is normally quite possible to
establish the range of a person's behavioural comfort and
competence, outside of which he/she is likely to be less
effective, or behave in ways inappropriate to the demands of
a particular role, function or task.
It is important to remember, at this stage, that
psychometric data is neither absolute, nor definitive. It
is, essentially, relative and indicative. That is, relative
to norms and indicative of areas of behaviour which it would
seem important to explore and examine further, in the light
of job and/or role requirements.
The descriptions accompanying the management decision
making profile should provide respondents (and their
sponsors) with clear picture of the key strengths,
preferences and areas for development, in the individual, in
all six areas of decision making activity.
The instrument thus should provide an informed basis for
dialogue and discussion about development needs and the
actions necessary to help individuals – and their
organisations – to capitalise upon and further develop
strengths, and what to do about weaknesses in problem
analysis and decision making.
In addition to the obvious help it can provide in individual
development, the management decision making profile
can be used, with effect, as a team building tool since it
can generate much useful feedback and discussion, as aid to
work group profiling. Here both analyses of collective
strengths, as well as areas for development at team – and
also cross-functional level – can be of major use in
developing more effective team and inter-departmental
working.
The significance of the scores against factors 'A' through
'F'
A. Inquiry is about :
·
Concern for accuracy
·
Fact finding
·
Defining standards
·
Defining principals
·
Defining criteria
·
Attention to detail
·
Probing data/information
·
Analysing
·
Classifying
·
Categorising
·
'What is it …..? |
C. Diagnosis is about:
·
Self confronting
·
Clarifying situations/problems
·
Crystallising issues
·
Establishing important priorities
·
Weighing up information
·
Accepting hard facts
·
Facing realities
·
Simplifying issues
·
'What is the main thing here?'
·
What's really important here?' |
B. Insight is about:
·
Concern to establish scope, range
and potential
·
Scanning problems/situations
·
Getting facts into perspective
·
Looking for alternatives or
options
·
Looking ahead
·
Bringing up new angles or short
cuts
·
Questioning assumptions
·
'What else….?'
·
What does it have to be like
this?' |
D. Driving is about:
·
Building resolve
·
Applying pressure
·
Resisting pressure
·
Persisting
·
Persevering
·
Getting to grips
·
Having strong purpose
·
Maintaining purpose
·
'What do we need?'
·
'Who, or what, is going to cause
the problem
|
E. Planning is about:
·
Foreseeing consequences and
outcomes
·
Sensing trends and patterns
·
Setting goals and objectives
·
Seeing the action steps ahead
·
Updating as conditions
change-proactive adaptability
·
'Live' action plans i.e. planning
ahead
·
Measuring progress
·
Sensing time scales e.g. short,
medium long
·
'Where out comes do we want?'
·
'How do we ensure our goals are
met?'
·
How do we best follow up?' |
F. Pace is about:
·
Flexibility, immediate
adaptability
·
Moment of decision
·
Adjusting time priorities
·
On the spot programming
·
Seizing opportunities
·
Making progress
·
Moving on
·
Speeding up or slowing dawn
·
'What is next..?'
·
'When?'
·
Selection election of the right
momenet, i.e. . seizure of the 'moment of
opportunity'
|
Essentially it is an
impassive
instrument using forced choice as the basis to its scoring.
The instrument seeks to measure behaviour along six
separate, but related, dimensions of problem analysis and
decision making. These are grouped in related pairs, broadly
representing 'left brain' and 'right brain' behaviours for
each of the three basic stages of managerial problem
solving, i.e.:
Stage |
'Left brain' activity |
'Right brain' Activity |
1.
Awareness (situational
analysis)
-
Concerns
-
Information available
-
Scope
|
Inquiry
-
searching
-
examining
-
probing
-
analysing
-
defining
-
categorising
|
Insight
-
intuiting
-
exploring situations
-
generating ideas
-
synthesising
-
scanning
-
creating
options
|
2.
Direction
(mission/task analysis)
|
Inquiry
-
assessing
-
weighing
-
clarifying
-
crystallising
-
simplifying
-
prioritising
|
Drive
-
insisting
-
persisting
-
resisting
-
being determined
-
being resolute
-
building purpose
|
3.
Action
(execution and commitment)
|
Planning
-
Foreseeing
-
Predicting
-
Anticipating
-
Preparing
-
Over viewing
-
Monitoring
-
Following up
|
Pace of response
|
The three groups of 'left brain' activities – inquiry
diagnosis and planning – are essentially, cognitive, logical
mental behaviours aimed variously identifying facts, detail,
what is important in problems or situations, and what
necessary proactive steps need to be taken in sequence, to
ensure that objectives are met that unintended consequences
are avoided, where possible.
The three groups of 'right brain' behaviours are less
'disciplined', premeditated and structured and are,
respectively, more a matter of intuitive 'feel', perception,
resolution, spontaneity and adaptability.
The basic structure of the instrument follows the
long-established and well proven situation
mission-execution model developed in the armed forces as
a basis for teaching decision making at both operational and
strategic level. Although the worlds of military business
leaders differ enormously, in many respects, the
intellectual and emotional processes involved in decision
making and problem resolution remain the same in the both –
and, indeed, in many other-working environments.
As with all psychometric instruments, the data and feedback
generated is usually more meaningful and in context when
seen in conjunction with:
·
Observed behaviour in a variety of situations
·
Track record and job/role performance
·
The accumulated feedback obtained from other relevant
psychometric profiles. |