Chapter 2:
Stress Concept and Definition |
Contents:
|
Definition

|
Stress is a
term that has been linked to varied concepts and operations.
For
some researchers it is stimulus, for others it is
an inferred inner state and for still others it is an
observable response to stimulus or situation. Thus the
use of the term is somewhat hazardous because of the lack of
consensus that prevails in stress research. (Dohrenwend &
Dohrenwend, 1974).
Some other
researchers prefer to use the term stressor to refer to
events that can cause stress, the organism’s biological and
behavioral response to the stressor (Davison & Neale, 1994,
p.191).
To solve the
problem, some researchers suggest to be more precise in our
usage of stress we must use stressor when talking about a
cause of stress and the word stress when talking about the
response to stressor (Holmes, 1994, p.39).
|
ý2.1
Stress as Stimulus
 |
2.1 Stress as Stimulus
The most
common definition of stress adopted by psychologists has
been that it is a stimulus. Stress stimuli are most
commonly thought of as events impinging on the person.
Stimulus definitions also include conditions arising within
the person (like hunger or sex) and arising also from
neurological characteristics. There are many kinds of events
from environment called stressors, which can classified in
three types – according to Lazarus & Cohen: Major changes,
often cataclysmic, affecting large numbers of persons, major
changes affecting one or a few persons, and daily hassles.
(Lazarus & Folkman 1984, p.12).
So we can
define stress as challenging event that requires
physiological, cognitive or behavioral adaptation (Oltmanns
& Emery, 1998, p. 287).
|
ý2.2
Stress as Response
 |
2.2 Stress as Response
Selye, for
example, continued to consider stress as a response to
environmental conditions, defined on the basis of such
diverse criteria as emotional upset, deterioration of
performance, or physiological changes such as increased skin
conductance or increases in the levels of certain hormones
(Apply & Trumball, 1967).
Others like
Lazarus say that stress cannot be objectively defined. So,
he suggests that the way we perceive or appraise the
environment determines when stress is present. More
specifically, stress is experienced when a situation is
appraised an exceeding the persons adaptive resources. This
is an important notion, for it allows us to account for
individual differences in how people respond to the same
events (Davison & Neale, 1994, p.191).
|
2.3
Stress as Relationship
 |
2.3 Stress as Relationship
Therefore,
most definitions of stress emphasize the relationship
between the individual and the environment. Stress is
the consequence of a person’s appraisal processes; the
assessment of whether personal resources are sufficient to
meet the demands of the environment. Stress, then, is
determined by person-environment fit. When a person’s
resources are more than adequate to deal with a difficult
situation, he or she may feel little stress. When the
individual perceives that his or her resources will probably
be sufficient to deal with the event but only at the cost of
great effort, he or she may feel a moderate amount of stress.
When the individual perceives that his or her resources will
probably not suffice to meet an environmental stressor, he
or she may experience a great deal of stress. Stress, then,
results from the process of appraising events (as harmful,
threatening or challenging), of assessing potential
responses, and of responding to those events (Lazarus &
Folkeman, 1984, p.19; Taylor, 1999, p.169).
Here,
stress can be defined as state of an organism subjected to a
stressor it can take form of increased autonomic activity
and in the long term, cause the breakdown of an organ or
development of a mental disorder (Davison & Neale, 1994, p.
G. 25)
|
|
|
|